Computer Andrew Harper was dragged to his demise behind a car (Image: PA)
Computer Andrew Harper’s widow has vowed to proceed the ‘agonising battle for justice’ for her husband.
Lissie Harper is awaiting the results of a bid by the Lawyer Normal to extend the sentences of her husband’s killers.
The policeman, 28, was caught in a strap connected to the again of a automobile pushed by Lengthy and dragged to his demise down a winding nation street.
Henry Lengthy, 19, was jailed for 16 years and 18-year-olds Jessie Cole and Albert Bowers have been handed 13 years in July over the demise of the Thames Valley Police visitors officer.
They’d been fleeing the scene of a quad bike theft in Berkshire on the night time of August 15 2019.
Lengthy – the chief of the group – admitted manslaughter, whereas passengers Cole and Bowers have been convicted of manslaughter after a trial on the Outdated Bailey.
Lissie Harper talking to the media immediately (Image: PA)
All three have been cleared of homicide by the jury, which deliberated for greater than 12 hours.
On the Courtroom of Attraction in London on Monday, Lawyer Normal Suella Braverman stated the trio’s sentences must be elevated, for an offence that was ‘as severe a case of manslaughter as it’s doable to envisage’.
However attorneys representing Lengthy, Cole and Bowers – who appeared by video hyperlink from HMP Belmarsh – argued that their sentences have been too lengthy and must be lowered.
On the conclusion of the listening to, Dame Victoria Sharp, sitting with Lord Justice Holroyde and Mr Justice William Davis, stated the court docket would give its ruling on the appeals at a later date.
Talking outdoors the Royal Courts of Justice after the listening to, Computer Harper’s widow Lissie Harper stated: ‘I stand earlier than you with my coronary heart as heavy because it was these many months in the past once I stood feeling let down and indignant outdoors of the Outdated Bailey.
‘But immediately I really feel pleasure in myself for not settling for one thing that I see as unacceptable.
‘Proud to battle for my heroic husband Andrew, as I additionally proceed to push for the protection and justice of his fellow emergency service protectors sooner or later.
‘Right this moment has been as harrowing as you may all count on, nonetheless we depart this court docket with at the very least a way of steadiness.
Thames Valley PC Andrew Harper (Image: PA)
‘Reaching a step nearer to a good consequence is one thing that I’ve strived in the direction of for a very long time.
‘We’ve got all hoped and prayed that our beloved boy’s demise is not going to go improperly unpunished.
‘So we proceed with our agonising battle for justice, a journey that now we have needed to endure for too lengthy.’
Mrs Braverman earlier instructed the court docket: ‘Computer Harper paid the final word worth for his bravery and this must be mirrored within the sentence.’
Referring to Lengthy’s sentence, Mrs Braverman stated: ‘A life sentence was the suitable sentence for the primary offender, who was and stays harmful… if not in a case corresponding to this, then when?’
She added that, if the court docket discovered Lengthy’s sentence was unduly lenient, Bowers and Cole’s sentences ‘also needs to have been commensurately longer’.
In written submissions, Mrs Braverman stated: ‘These are sentences which have induced and proceed to trigger widespread public concern. It seems to me that the sentences handed on the offenders have been unduly lenient.’
Rossano Scamardella QC, representing Lengthy, stated Mrs Braverman’s feedback about ‘widespread public concern’ ought to have ‘no affect on the difficulty of whether or not this sentence must be adjusted someway’.
He stated: ‘Widespread public concern isn’t essentially an indicator that one thing has gone fallacious, both with a verdict or a sentence.’
He instructed the court docket Computer Harper’s demise was the results of ‘a freakish accident’ after he turned connected to the again of the automobile, including: ‘There was no intentional utility of pressure or violence… there was no intent in any way to trigger severe bodily hurt or demise.’
Timothy Raggatt QC, representing Bowers, stated: ‘The concept these sentences could possibly be described as unduly lenient… is, to be blunt, far-fetched within the excessive.’
The court docket didn’t give any indication when it’s more likely to ship its ruling.
Get in contact with our information crew by emailing us at [email protected].
For extra tales like this, check our news page.