Mark Hambrick allegedly killed his daughter Amira, proper, as a ‘sacrifice to God’ in 2017, with specialists arguing on Tuesday that he’s too mentally-ill to face trial for the crime
A father accused of stabbing and suffocating his 18 month-old daughter to dying claims to have achieved in order a sacrifice to God, a court docket heard. Mark Hambrick allegedly mentioned he killed his daughter Amina in New Orleans in 2017, in order that he’d be executed and resurrected.
Hambrick is claimed to consider that he’s Jesus Christ, and that he receives direct messages from God, a psychological competency listening to was instructed Monday. Skilled witness Dr Janet Johnson mentioned Hambrick believed he can be executed in 2019 – the four-hundredth anniversary of the primary slave ships arriving within the US.
Dr Johnson spoke to Hambrick earlier this yr, and says she highlighted that it was already 2020, just for him to allegedly inform her that ‘our time’ is completely different to ‘God’s time.’ She mentioned that was proof of his capacity to bend actuality in order that it matches his delusions.
The physician added: ‘He admits he is aware of it sounds loopy to different individuals,’ however added that Hambrick is ‘agency’ in his private beliefs. Tuesday’s listening to was meant to determine whether or not Hambrick would ever be mentally competent to face trial for Amina’s homicide.
State medical doctors say they’ve already come to the conclusion that Hambrick’s psychological sickness is simply too extreme for him to face a jury.
He known as police after stabbing and suffocating Amira to inform them what he had achieved, then waited for them to come back and arrest him, and let officers take him in with out incident.
Prosecutor Daniel Good highlighted Hambrick’s masters diploma and profession as an auditor as proof of his intelligence, and requested if medicine may assist deal with his delusions.
He additionally inquired if Hambrick may have been efficiently faking his signs to attempt to keep away from a trial.
However a panel of 4 medical doctors mentioned they’d agreed Hambrick would in all probability by no means get higher, and that they’d beforehand handled him on anti-psychotic medicine for a yr.
Prosecution witness Dr Rafael Salcedo, a type of 4 medical doctors, mentioned there was ‘no proof’ Hambrick was faking his accidents.
He additionally highlighted the truth that Hambrick doesn’t want to plead not responsible by motive of madness, and would reasonably be allowed to confess his crimes to he might be executed for homicide.
Choose Robin Pittman will rule on Hambrick’s accountability at a later date.
Get in contact with our information workforce by emailing us at [email protected]
For extra tales like this, check our news page